Link: Infection Control Today
Rigorous attention to patient safety and monitoring for unexpected spikes in bloodstream infection rates at the Johns Hopkins Hospital led a team of Hopkins specialists to uncover an unintended, surprising safety problem with a new device that was supposed to make patients safer and easier to treat.
“No one could have anticipated this outcome,” says senior hospital epidemiologist Trish Perl, MD, an associate professor of medicine and pathology at The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. “But, our experience underscores how advances in technology designed to improve healthcare may also have hidden risks to patients that can only be identified by paying close attention to what happens after the technology is put into practice.”
In a case study reported in the latest edition of the journal Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology online Jan. 6, 2006, a team of Hopkins patient safety experts describe how the introduction of a catheter valve newly marketed to the hospital in April 2004 coincided with a spike in potentially deadly bloodstream infections picked up by patients in the hospital’s pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and other intensive care units.
Once the increased rate was confirmed, Hopkins experts launched an investigation that identified an intravenous catheter valve as the likely source of infection. No one at Hopkins died from the infections. Hopkins stopped using the valve and alerted the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which approves use of medical devices, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which monitors infections in hospitals, the report noted.